New York is a city in the United States (CNN Business) The Federal Reserve's objective is to promote monetary system stability in the United States. It's why the central bank was established in 1913, and it's why it's still around today.
When inflation threatens to undermine the dollar, it is the Fed's responsibility to intervene. They have a number of weapons at their disposal, but hiking interest rates to chill the economy is the most effective in this situation. The Fed is accomplishing just that, with inflation rates in the United States now at 40-year highs.Jerome Powell, the chairman of the Federal Reserve, indicated last week that the Fed will raise interest rates by three-quarters of a percentage point, the highest increase in 28 years. He did, however, adopt a more solemn tone than in previous encounters, recognizing that some issues are beyond his control.
Powell said on Wednesday that the Fed's goal is to keep inflation at 2% while keeping the labor market healthy, but "I think what's becoming increasingly evident is that many things that we don't control are going to play a very big part in deciding whether that's doable or not." Inflation will continue to be impacted by commodity prices, the Ukraine conflict, and supply chain turmoil, he said, and no adjustment in monetary policy can alleviate those factors.He believes that there is still a road to lowering inflation rates to 2%, but that path is getting increasingly overrun by external influences.
Powell's remarks were essentially at contrast with White House rhetoric, which has highlighted that the Fed is the country's designated inflation-fighter.When economic data revealed that inflation was still at a 40-year high and consumer mood had plummeted to a new low earlier this month, the Biden Administration credited the Federal Reserve with bringing prices under control.
"The Fed has the tools it needs, and we're providing the space it needs to operate," said Brian Deese, the National Economic Council's director.
Powell, on the other hand, was pushing a different narrative last week. He claims that he has little control over rising petrol and food prices. He believes that proper monetary policy alone will no longer be enough to return us to a 2% inflation rate and a healthy labor market.
On Wednesday, Powell stated, "So much of it is really not down to monetary policy." "The aftermath from the Ukraine conflict has resulted in a jump in energy, food, fertilizer, industrial chemicals, and, more widely, supply chains, which has been larger — or longer lasting — than expected."
That viewpoint is shared by Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody's Analytics. "The biggest culprit [of inflation] was rising energy prices, notably gasoline," he said in a recent edition of his podcast, Moody's Talks. "A lot of that can be linked back to Russia's invasion of Ukraine, which caused global oil prices to soar." When the pandemic declines and the market responds to additional sanctions against Russia, inflation should ease, he noted.
It's difficult to determine whether raising interest rates will help stop inflation's wildfire spread or if it'll be too little, too late. Powell appears to be hedging his bets. "I believe the events of the last few months have increased the difficulty and presented significant obstacles," Powell added. "And there's a lot more likelihood now that it'll be determined by variables we can't control."The $5.7 billion wager on Europe's demise
Affluent Americans enjoy vacationing in Europe. The richest guy in Connecticut wants to stake multibillion-dollar bets on the old world's economic future.
Bridgewater Associates, led by Ray Dalio, is betting roughly $6 billion that European equities would plummet. As a result, the world's largest hedge fund is also the largest short seller of Euro stocks.
Bridgewater now has 18 active short positions on European firms, including a $1 billion bet against semiconductor giant ASML Holding and a $752 million bet against oil and gas company TotalEnergies SE.
This isn't the first time Bridgewater has faced a challenge. For a long time, Dalio has been on Europe's side. Bridgewater invested $14 billion against the region's stocks in 2020, and they had a $22 billion short position on the region in 2018.
Pourquoi? Bridgewater has been tight-lipped about its Euro strategy in general, but an interview Dalio gave to the Italian newspaper La Repubblica last week provided some hints. Bridgewater is steering away from countries that are at risk of domestic unrest or international conflict, he noted. He also expressed concern about central banks' attempts to combat excessive inflation, predicting that the economy will soon deteriorate as a result.
In summary, he's going short due to the conflict in Ukraine and the hawkish stance of the European Central Banks.
However, it's possible that it's about the struggle for global order. Dalio hasn't shied away from expressing his broader perspective. He described why he believes the United States is on the verge of civil war in a series of LinkedIn blog postings, as well as how the global world order is altering.
"The most attention-grabbing component of the evolving world order dynamic that is unfolding is the Russia-Ukraine-US-other-countries dynamic," he writes. "However, it is effectively the first fight in what will be a long war for world order domination."
Bridgewater, which has $151 billion in assets, may be betting that Europe will not emerge victorious from the conflict.
So far, the gamble has paid off. This year, the company's flagship Pure Alpha fund has gained 26.2 percent, while the S&P 500 has lost nearly 24 percent.
Year-to-date, the STOXX Europe 600, a broad index that monitors the European stock market, is down almost 17%.
[zombify_post]
0 Comments